Prevalence and Clinical Significance of Pulmonary Venous Orifice Variants

Authors

  • Ayesha Saleem Department of Anatomy, Fatima Memorial Hospital of Medicine and Dentistry, Lahore – Pakistan
  • Yasmeen Bashir Department of Anatomy, Services Institute of Medical Sciences, Lahore - Pakistan
  • Ayesha Raheem Department of Anatomy, King Edward Medical University, Lahore - Pakistan
  • Zaffar Iqbal Malik Department of Anatomy, Sahara Medical College, Narowal - Pakistan
  • Asma Fayyaz Department of Anatomy, Services Institute of Medical Sciences, Lahore - Pakistan

Keywords:

Pulmonary Veins, Anatomical Variants, Common Ostium, Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

Abstract

Background: Awareness of pulmonary venous anatomy and variants is essential for diagnostic and interventional cardiology, especially in the scenario of atrial fibrillation ablation and cardiothoracic surgery. Even though the classical type of four discrete pulmonary venous orifices is the most prevalent, many anatomical variations have been described that could influence clinical results. Objective: To evaluate the prevalence, morphology, and clinical implications of pulmonary venous orifice variants by imaging-based analysis in a regional patient population. Methodology: A total of 65 patients were assessed to determine normal anatomy and variant patterns of pulmonary venous drainage. Variants examined were accessory pulmonary veins, common ostia, anomalous pulmonary venous return (PAPVR), and rare orifice anomalies. Prevalence rates were determined and contrasted with prior published studies. Data was analyzed using SPSS version 26. Results: Normal anatomy with four discrete pulmonary venous orifices was found in 66.2% of patients. Variants were identified in 33.8% of cases, with accessory pulmonary veins (18.5%), the most frequent being the right middle pulmonary vein; common ostium formations (10.8%), with a predominance involving the left superior and inferior veins; partial anomalous pulmonary venous return (3.1%), with drainage into the superior vena cava and brachiocephalic vein; and one rare case (1.5%) of missing left inferior pulmonary vein orifice with fusion into the left superior pulmonary vein. Conclusion: Pulmonary venous orifice variants are common and clinically relevant, with the right middle pulmonary vein and left common ostium being the most prevalent. Identification of these variants is necessary for proper imaging interpretation, secure operative planning, and successful catheter ablation procedures to prevent complications and recurrence of atrial arrhythmias.

References

Lyen S, Peacock JL, Desai U, Macgowan GA, Bean L, Naguib A, et al. Anomalous pulmonary venous drainage: a pictorial essay with embryology, imaging, and hemodynamics. J Congenital Cardiol. 2017;4(1):8. DOI:10.1186/s40949-017-0008-4.

McLellan AJ, Ling LH, Ruggiero D, Wong MC, Walters TE, Nisbet A, et al. Pulmonary vein isolation: the impact of pulmonary venous anatomy on long-term outcome of catheter ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2014;11(4):549-56. DOI:10.1016/j.hrthm.2013.12.019.

Wang Z, Lai Z, Zhang X, Huang P, Xie J, Jiang Q, et al. Altered gut microbiome compositions are associated with the severity of asthma. J Thorac Dis. 2021;13(7):4322-36. DOI:10.21037/jtd-21-798.

Pandey NN, Taxak A, Kumar S. Normal pulmonary venous anatomy and non-anomalous variations demonstrated on CT angiography: what the radiologist needs to know? Br J Radiol. 2020;93(1116):20200595. DOI:10.1259/bjr.20200595.

Schwartzman D, Lacomis J, Wigginton WG. Characterization of left atrium and distal pulmonary vein morphology using multidimensional computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;41(8):1349-57. DOI:10.1016/s0735-1097(03)00132-8.

Skowerski M, Wozniak-Skowerska I, Hoffmann A, Nowak S, Skowerski T, Sosnowski M, et al. Pulmonary vein anatomy variants as a biomarker of atrial fibrillation – CT angiography evaluation. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2018;18:146. DOI:10.1186/s12872-018-0884-3.

Kato R, Lickfett L, Meininger G, Dickfeld T, Wu R, Juang G, et al. Pulmonary vein anatomy in patients undergoing catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: lessons learned by use of magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation. 2003;107(15):2004-10. DOI:10.1161/01.CIR.0000061951.81767.4E.

Bhargava K, Singh J, Kler TS. Change in atrial activation sequence during orthodromic reciprocating tachycardia: what is the mechanism? Heart Rhythm. 2007;4(9):1235-7. DOI:10.1016/j.hrthm.2007.04.024.

Marom EM, Herndon JE, Kim YH, McAdams HP. Variations in pulmonary venous drainage to the left atrium: implications for radiofrequency ablation. Radiology. 2004;230(3):824-9. DOI:10.1148/radiol.2303030300.

Ho SY, Cabrera JA, Tran VH, Farré J, Anderson RH, Sanchez-Quintana D. Architecture of the pulmonary veins: relevance to radiofrequency ablation. Heart. 2001;86(3):265-70. DOI:10.1136/heart.86.3.265.

Lioni L, Korantzopoulos P, Letsas KP. Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in overweight and obese patients. J Atr Fibrillation. 2011;4(4):1216. DOI:10.4022/jafib.1216.

Wong CA. Advances in labor analgesia. Int J Womens Health. 2010;2:139-54. DOI:10.2147/ijwh.s6914.

Marrouche NF, Dresing T, Cole C, Bash D, Saad E, Balaban K, et al. Circular mapping and ablation of the pulmonary vein for treatment of atrial fibrillation: impact of different catheter technologies. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;40(6):464–474. DOI:10.1016/S0735-1097(02)02141-1.

Takami M, Nakashima H, Sairaku A, Ochi A, Tokuyama T, Yoshida Y, et al. Impact of alcohol consumption on the efficacy of catheter ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. J Cardiol. 2015;65(5):460-6. DOI:10.1016/j.jjcc.2014.06.009.

Lin YJ, Tsao HM, Chang SL, Lo LW, Tuan TC, Hu YF, et al. Prognostic implications of the CHADSâ‚‚ score in catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol. 2009;104(1):41-6. DOI:10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.02.070.

Haïssaguerre M, Jaïs P, Shah DC, Takahashi A, Hocini M, Quiniou G, et al. Spontaneous initiation of atrial fibrillation by ectopic beats originating in the pulmonary veins. N Engl J Med. 1998;339(10):659-66. DOI:10.1056/NEJM199809033391003.

Fox CS, Parise H, D’Agostino RB Sr, Lloyd-Jones DM, Vasan RS, Wang TJ, et al. Parental atrial fibrillation as a risk factor for atrial fibrillation in offspring: the Framingham Heart Study. JAMA. 2004;291(23):2851-5. DOI:10.1001/jama.291.23.2851.

Wei W, Zhou H, He H, Lin H, Tandon YK, Jaykel TJ, et al. Right middle pulmonary vein classification by 3D-CT reconstruction and its clinical significance. J Thorac Dis. 2023;15(12):6868-6878. DOI:10.21037/jtd-23-1560.

Rahnama N, Kubangumusu L, Pasquet A, Robert A, Pouleur AC, Carbonez K, et al. Partial anomalous pulmonary venous return in adults: Insight into pulmonary hypertension. Int J Cardiol Congenit Heart Dis. 2022;11:100426. DOI:10.1016/j.ijcchd.2022.100426.

Sherif HM. The developing pulmonary veins and left atrium: implications for ablation strategy for atrial fibrillation. Eur J Cardio-Thorac Surg. 2013;44(5):792-9. DOI:10.1093/ejcts/ezt098.

Rodriguez-Manero M, Schurmann P, Valderrabano M. Ligament and vein of Marshall: a therapeutic opportunity in atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2016;13(2):593-601. DOI:10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.10.018.

Ammash NM, Seward JB, Warnes CA, Connolly HM, O’Leary PW, Danielson GK. Partial anomalous pulmonary venous connection: diagnosis by transesophageal echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;29(6):1351–8. DOI:10.1016/S0735-1097(97)82758-1.

Jujo T, Tanabe N, Sugiura T, Naito A, Shigeta A, Kitazono-Saitoh M, et al. Importance of carefully interpreting computed tomography images to detect partial anomalous pulmonary venous return. Respir Investig. 2016;54(1):69–74. DOI:10.1016/j.resinv.2015.08.008.

Mansour M, Holmvang G, Sosnovik D, Migrino R, Abbara S, Ruskin J, et al. Assessment of pulmonary vein anatomic variability by magnetic resonance imaging: implications for catheter ablation techniques for atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2004;15(4):387–393. DOI:10.1046/j.1540-8167.2004.03515.x.

Downloads

Published

2024-09-02

How to Cite

Saleem, A., Bashir, Y., Raheem, A., Malik, Z. I., & Fayyaz, A. (2024). Prevalence and Clinical Significance of Pulmonary Venous Orifice Variants. Pakistan Journal of Chest Medicine, 30(3), 381–389. Retrieved from http://www.pjcm.net/index.php/pjcm/article/view/978

Issue

Section

Original Article